Visual Rhetoric

Cynthia Persaud: Visual Rhetoric

In the first part of “Graphs, Maps, Trees”, Moretti discuss ways to read by using graphs. The author focus on telling his readers that graphs are not only used in math and science but can also be used in literature as well. Moretti uses visuals from history to explain his idea. HE charts the number of new novels published each year in Denmark, France, Japan and Italy and connected them to political and social changes. He also argues that literary studies have been random and unsystematic. To me, he was persuasive because after reading part one of the book I thought that his points were very clear that he made. I think that the graphs were clear and it shows the points being made. I liked figure 9: British novelistic genres the best because it shows the different genres and how they start to disappear.

I found the website informationisbeautiful.com to be very interesting. I liked all of the remixes on that page. I found Plane truth dragged my attention because it shows all the plane crashes for the past 20 years. It was not in a regular time but in colorful square boxes.   When randomly selected box are clicked on, it provided the date, location and causes of the crashes. I also liked the mind-full meditation remix. It shows you different ways to fee relax and how to stay positive.

4 Comments

  1. Hey Cynthia,

    Good read right? How do you feel, you think data is better than reading in depth? I still think literacy studies have a lot to give, but I do feel as though the data studies help as well. I really liked the visuals on the site to? Its def proof that visuals help!

    -Sadad

  2. Cynthia
    After reading Moretti’s Graph’s what do you think a graph and charts can accomplish in literary studies that written text can not do ? Do you believe these visuals can be more helpful or harmful when trying to understand the history of the novel and do you think it’s applicable to the study of literature ?

  3. I’d like to see more engagement with the text from you, Cynthia. I want to see what kinds of questions, ideas, problems, and new information you’re finding in our readings and how you’re able to apply them. Challenge yourself to go beyond liking/disliking or pointing out issues of clarity without evidence. Answering your peers’ questions above will be a good start!

Leave a Reply